|
Safety-Zones®
Providing
the Ways to Information & Identity Theft
Protection*
Safety-Zones® Verifies the Voter's ID and Insures One-vote
Voting
Voting
is an information process that can be protected by Safety-Zones®.
The State would be the account holder. A city or town within
the State would
be a subset or 'client account holder'. Voters would be allowed
to make specific election choices provided by the municipality.
In
theory, when we look at the Safety-Zones
process we
discover that it has the features we would need to verify the
voter's ID and insure one-vote voting either within a specific
voting location or from anywhere by way of the Worldwide Web -
the Internet, with 'processing' as safe as the billions of credit
card transactions that are processed every day
on private and secure networks. Let's first review each control
feature that will do this individually then apply them to voting.
'Symbolic
Representation' of the Safety-Zones
process (for descriptive purposes only)
Information
to be transferred waits for conditions ABCDEF
to be verified before the transaction is
authorized
----ll ll---- this
represents a circuit or gate to be closed
to complete the transaction
A = How? A1 ----ll
ll---- A1 (B
& M = Physical Location)
Or
A2 ----ll ll----
A2
(Using the World Wide Web)
B
----ll ll---- B
= Who are you? = ID = Prove
to me who you are by entering your Safety-Zones
identification.
C ----ll ll----
C = Which account are you
using?
D
----ll ll---- D
= Where? Country? Area? Zip?
E
----ll ll---- E
= How Much? ($ Limit) and
How Many? (Payments)
F
----ll ll---- F
= When? Only when I say so!
Applied
to voting, here are the various ways that
these parameters can be shared by
each account holder and the Registrar
of Voters (ROV) in a particular voting
precinct for each voting transaction:
AV: Verification of how each
valid voting account is to be used: This
would take the form of whether you are expected
to vote in your normal precinct (Brick &
Mortar - B&M), by default, or whether
you have been approved to cast an 'absentee
ballot' by way of the private voting network
(on the Internet). The selection would be
made by the ROV or by you, whichever the
ROV permits. The software program would
be designed to provide and control these
features.
BV:
Verification of who you are for voting
purposes: Although voting within home precincts
in most locations is thought to be relatively
accurate we have all heard of various forms
of fraud. Here we ask that you read the
section below on Proof
of Identity. The software program would
be designed to check and prove your identity
before you are allowed to vote. This would
end all vote fraud.
CV: Verification of which
account opened in your name has your permission
to be used. Initially, we are proposing
that voting be on an isolated (voting only)
or private network, so this feature would
not be used.
Later, when everyone is convinced that the
process works as expected, the selection
which could be made part of a wider-used
network created for private information
transactions - see guarding private information,
like medical records and licenses, with
a selection that is for 'Voting'.
DV: Verification of where
each valid voting account is to be used
has two (2) components: From and to:
1) The voting system (software) would
permit the vote to come from only one preselected
zone or area. For example, USA-Zip Code
nnnnnn. Or if the person is known to be
serving in the military in Iraq, for example,
then only from a zone in Iraq. The system
(software) could also be set to allow a
voter to walk into to any voting precinct
in the
Safety-Zones voting
system and vote.
2) The voting system would also control
where the vote is to be recorded. To minimize
complications and maintain the highest level
of overall system performance, for verification
purposes during a voting period when many
transactions are be processed, we recommend
votes be recorded only in the voter's home
precinct.
The
verification and approval of both geographic
locations creates a voting transaction safety
zone. When the vote is cast the transaction
would record both the from and to locations
for audit purposes.
EV: Verification of how many
transactions are permitted: Here the system
is preset to permit only one voting transaction
per voter. Using
the voter's home precinct to record the
vote makes denial of a second vote in the
voter's name simple.
FV: Verification of when each
approved voter can cast a vote or set of
votes: This also has two (2) components:
1) The day(s) and range of time over
which the ROV permits votes to be cast,
and 2) when the voter actually cast
the vote(s) within the permitted time period.
Both would be approved (or denied) and recorded.
We
would also suggest that votes cast by people
who are in someway not able to physically
cast their own vote during an election be
visited by an authorized agent of the ROV
during the longer period usually allotted
for absentee ballots, to allow each person
to cast a vote by laptop computer via the
Web under unbiased supervision, or perhaps
by using a curbside 'votemobile'.
This would, for example, prevent misrepresentation
of those who are not able to come to the
polling place because of physical limitations.
And it would help those displaced due to
natural disasters. When you fully understand
and come to appreciate how the Safety-Zones
process works doing this should not be of
concern to you.
Block
Diagram of the Symbolic Process
Safety-Zones
is Circuit BV and is used to approve
and control the voting transactions
in Circuit AV
|
Web
e-Commerce Zone
|
| Private
network |
|
Encryption,
only if necessary
|
|
.
|
A1
B&M?
|
B
Who?
(ID)
|
C
Which Account?
|
D
Where?
(Safety Zone)
|
E
How Much?
How Many?
|
F
When?
(When I say so!)
|
.
|
|
A2 Internet?
|
|
Encryption,
only if necessary
|
| Private
network |
|
Web
e-Commerce Zone
|
Circuit
BV
Circuit
AV in this application is the one that exits
to process your voting selections
|
Web
e-Commerce Zone
|
|
Private
network
|
|
Encryption,
if used
|
|
< When all information in Circuit
BV is verified to be correct and the
circuit is closed
your voting selections are permitted
in this circuit - Circuit AV >
|
|
Encryption,
if used
|
|
Private
network
|
|
Web
e-Commerce Zone
|
Circuit
AV
Essentially, you would submit
your voting choices, and at the same time
give electronic approval for them to be
cast within the settings of Safety-Zones.
In
the following example Safety-Zones
is being used for voting purposes in a specific
building designated for voting. (Not on
a home computer or from a PDA.)
|
B&M
|
Internet
|
.
|
Qty
|
1
|
-
|
USA
|
|
-
Safety-Zones®
-
|
.
|
On
|
Off
|
Zip
Code
|
Area
Code
|
|
Your
Voting Location
|
2
|
|
.
|
29403
|
843
|
|
Your
ID
|
3
|
|
.
|
29403
|
843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your Vote Permitted
|
4
|
|
.
|
29403
|
843
|
Exhibit
AV
Here
you are voting in the USA in your home precinct,
which is Zip Code 29403 (Charleston, South
Carolina), for one voting transaction. The
number 2 represents the ID of your voting
location and the specific 'machine' used;
the number 3 represents the
Safety-Zones personal ID that
you created and you control; the number
4 represents the ID of your vote. Everything
would be recorded in such a way so as to
be able to match the transactions in both
circuits AV & BV later. This clearly
demonstrates that Safety-Zones
can define a safe zone for a vote
transaction.
With
ROV approval, this process would eventually
let any voter walk into any voting
location, show appropriate identification1,
provide a computer system personal identity
known only to Safety-Zones,
then vote. The vote would be recorded in
only the voter's registered voting location,
and the transaction would record the exact
location, time and date the vote was cast.
With this process in place there would be
no need for paper absentee ballots. This
is shown in Exhibit BV.
Note
1: Showing identification when entering
a voting location is meant only to support
the idea that voting locations should be
protected from vandals and to keep away
those that don't belong in the voting location;
it has nothing to do with the safety and
security of the Safety-Zones
process.
|
B&M
|
Internet
|
.
|
Qty
|
1
|
-
|
USA
|
|
-
Safety-Zones®
-
|
.
|
On
|
Off
|
Zip
Code
|
Area
Code
|
|
Your
Voting Location
|
6
|
|
.
|
87501
|
505
|
|
Your
ID
|
7
|
|
.
|
87501
|
505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your
Vote Permitted
|
8
|
|
.
|
84606
|
801
|
Exhibit
BV
Here
you have chosen to cast your vote from Zip
Code 87501 (Santa Fe, New Mexico), and because
you are registered to vote in USA Zip Code
84606 (Provo, Utah) that is where your vote
will actually be recorded.
|
B&M
|
Internet
|
.
|
Qty
|
1
|
-
|
USA
|
|
-
Safety-Zones®
-
|
.
|
On
|
Off
|
Zip
Code
|
Area
Code
|
|
Your
Voting Location
|
86
|
|
.
|
MHQ38
|
Mideast6
|
|
Your
ID
|
17
|
|
.
|
MHQ38
|
Mideast6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your
Vote Permitted
|
18
|
|
.
|
66112
|
913
|
Exhibit
CV
In
this example you are in the military and
on assignment in the Middle East represented
by Mideast6. You have authorization (within
the voting system) from your Registrar of
Voters-ROV to cast your vote from there.
'There' is a military facility represented
by MHQ38 that the Safety-Zones
process recognizes as 'real'. Because you
are registered to vote in USA Zip Code 66112
(Kansas City, Kansas) that is where your
vote will actually be recorded.
These examples are for descriptive purposes
only.
Proof of Identity
(Copied,
more or less, from page 2 for your convenience)
Once
Safety-Zones
is put in place it is estimated that it
will not only eliminate over 90% of the
fraudulent use of credit cards, but it could
easily provide for safe electronic voting.
However, if we permit anyone to create or
use an account with Safety-Zones,
without proof of identity, then we are defeating
the purpose of any identity theft protection
process. What follows is the
same argument and proposed solution offered
on a previous page.
To
ensure this does not happen, we need an
independent identity verification process
to prevent thieves from opening or continuing
to use fraudulent accounts in the names
of others. One method that might be used
is to require that everyone signing up for
identity theft protection be authenticated
by a special computerized verification process
managed by either authorized banks requiring
proof of identity or by local police departments
or motor vehicle licensing departments that
perform the same task.
Once
the person signing up for a Safety-Zones
account is authenticated and his or her
identifying information is placed in the
system he or she would be allowed to create
an ID known only to Safety-Zones
that he or she may manage.
Physical identification will necessarily
become an important proof of identity requirement
to open a Safety-Zones
account . For this police departments could
purchase computers with special features
for verifying information and collecting
fingerprints to be used only in the identity
theft protection process3.
Each person wanting to open an identity
theft protection account, like Safety-Zones,
would bring the information to the police
department, have their fingerprint(s) taken
and pay an 'authentication' and setup fee
for the service. This pays the police department
for the computer and the online hook up,
and the funds collected above their costs
would provide a source of revenue to the
municipality involved. The information collected
would go into an identity theft protection
database. Nothing would be done with the
information collected until there is a conflict
of information from the ongoing matching
of information, at which time a designated
authority would determine the problem and
resolve it. Clearly, the fingerprint information
would be used to ensure that no person has
two names or two accounts, and that two
different people could not claim to have
the same social security number.
Note
3: This method would be superior to the
method proposed by 3M (see
Plague on Links page) in that there
would be no need for anyone to carry a card
imprinted with a fingerprint; the fingerprint
would only exist in the database as physical
proof of the identity of the account holder.
The system can also have built-in safeguards.
For example, upon certification of death,
an account can be kept active but permanently
closed to use through Safety-Zones
for x years or until the account is closed
legally. The deciding and most important
factor is that Safety-Zones
provides the safety zone because
it is always in the "off state condition",
and only turned on to permit a transaction,
so even upon death the account holder's
accounts or information are protected against
misuse. To gain the full benefit of Safety-Zones,
off-line manual credit card imprinting and
acceptance without some form of on-line
electronic verification would need to be
eliminated.
Back
to BV
When
used for voting purposes Safety-Zones®
is offered free of licensing fees
How
You Can Help
You
can help us to help you by simply telling
others about Safety-Zones,
and by contacting your State Representative,
Congressional Representative or State Senator.
Eventually enough public pressure could also
put the process in place, unless someone or
some company has a better solution.
Links: State
Government or search Yahoo or Google
for 'state
government webpage' . US
House of Representatives webpage . US
Senate webpage
Corporations
that issue credit cards could also be contacted. Here is a partial
list: Visa®
. MasterCard®
. American
Express® . Discover®
|